2. Provider
Overview
The provider
API defines interfaces that Provider Authors can use to abstract a particular flag management system, thus enabling the use of the evaluation API
by Application Authors.
Providers are the "translator" between the flag evaluation calls made in application code, and the flag management system that stores flags and in some cases evaluates flags. At a minimum, providers should implement some basic evaluation methods which return flag values of the expected type. In addition, providers may transform the evaluation context appropriately in order to be used in dynamic evaluation of their associated flag management system, provide insight into why evaluation proceeded the way it did, and expose configuration options for their associated flag management system. Hypothetical provider implementations might wrap a vendor SDK, embed an REST client, or read flags from a local file.
2.1. Feature Provider Interface
Requirement 2.1.1
The provider interface MUST define a
metadata
member or accessor, containing aname
field or accessor of type string, which identifies the provider implementation.
provider.getMetadata().getName(); // "my-custom-provider"
2.2 Flag Value Resolution
Providers
are implementations of the feature provider
interface, which may wrap vendor SDKs, REST API clients, or otherwise resolve flag values from the runtime environment.
Requirement 2.2.1
The
feature provider
interface MUST define methods to resolve flag values, with parametersflag key
(string, required),default value
(boolean | number | string | structure, required) andevaluation context
(optional), which returns aresolution details
structure.
// example flag resolution function
resolveBooleanValue(flagKey, defaultValue, context);
see: flag resolution structure, flag value resolution
Condition 2.2.2
The implementing language type system differentiates between strings, numbers, booleans and structures.
Conditional Requirement 2.2.2.1
The
feature provider
interface MUST define methods for typed flag resolution, including boolean, numeric, string, and structure.
// example boolean flag value resolution
ResolutionDetails resolveBooleanValue(string flagKey, boolean defaultValue, context: EvaluationContext);
// example string flag value resolution
ResolutionDetails resolveStringValue(string flagKey, string defaultValue, context: EvaluationContext);
// example number flag value resolution
ResolutionDetails resolveNumberValue(string flagKey, number defaultValue, context: EvaluationContext);
// example structure flag value resolution
ResolutionDetails resolveStructureValue(string flagKey, JsonObject defaultValue, context: EvaluationContext);
Requirement 2.2.3
In cases of normal execution, the
provider
MUST populate theresolution details
structure'svalue
field with the resolved flag value.
Requirement 2.2.4
In cases of normal execution, the
provider
SHOULD populate theresolution details
structure'svariant
field with a string identifier corresponding to the returned flag value.
For example, the flag value might be 3.14159265359
, and the variant field's value might be "pi"
.
The value of the variant field might only be meaningful in the context of the flag management system associated with the provider. For example, the variant may be a UUID corresponding to the variant in the flag management system, or an index corresponding to the variant in the flag management system.
Requirement 2.2.5
The
provider
SHOULD populate theresolution details
structure'sreason
field with"STATIC"
,"DEFAULT",
"TARGETING_MATCH"
,"SPLIT"
,"CACHED"
,"DISABLED"
,"UNKNOWN"
,"STALE"
,"ERROR"
or some other string indicating the semantic reason for the returned flag value.
As indicated in the definition of the resolution details
structure, the reason
should be a string. This allows providers to reflect accurately why a flag was resolved to a particular value.
Requirement 2.2.6
In cases of normal execution, the
provider
MUST NOT populate theresolution details
structure'serror code
field, or otherwise must populate it with a null or falsy value.
Requirement 2.2.7
In cases of abnormal execution, the
provider
MUST indicate an error using the idioms of the implementation language, with an associatederror code
and optional associatederror message
.
The provider might throw an exception, return an error, or populate the error code
object on the returned resolution details
structure to indicate a problem during flag value resolution.
See error code for details.
// example throwing an exception with an error code and optional error message.
throw new ProviderError(ErrorCode.INVALID_CONTEXT, "The 'foo' attribute must be a string.");
Condition 2.2.8
The implementation language supports generics (or an equivalent feature).
Conditional Requirement 2.2.8.1
The
resolution details
structure SHOULD accept a generic argument (or use an equivalent language feature) which indicates the type of the wrappedvalue
field.
// example boolean flag value resolution with generic argument
ResolutionDetails<boolean> resolveBooleanValue(string flagKey, boolean defaultValue, context: EvaluationContext);
// example string flag value resolution with generic argument
ResolutionDetails<string> resolveStringValue(string flagKey, string defaultValue, context: EvaluationContext);
// example number flag value resolution with generic argument
ResolutionDetails<number> resolveNumberValue(string flagKey, number defaultValue, context: EvaluationContext);
// example structure flag value resolution with generic argument
ResolutionDetails<MyStruct> resolveStructureValue(string flagKey, MyStruct defaultValue, context: EvaluationContext);
Requirement 2.2.9
The
provider
SHOULD populate theresolution details
structure'sflag metadata
field.
Requirement 2.2.10
flag metadata
MUST be a structure supporting the definition of arbitrary properties, with keys of typestring
, and values of typeboolean | string | number
.
2.3. Provider hooks
A provider hook
exposes a mechanism for provider authors
to register hooks
to tap into various stages of the flag evaluation lifecycle. These hooks can be used to perform side effects and mutate the context for purposes of the provider. Provider hooks are not configured or controlled by the application author
.
Requirement 2.3.1
The provider interface MUST define a
provider hook
mechanism which can be optionally implemented in order to addhook
instances to the evaluation life-cycle.
class MyProvider implements Provider {
//...
readonly hooks: Hook[] = [new MyProviderHook()];
// ..or alternatively..
getProviderHooks(): Hook[] {
return [new MyProviderHook()];
}
//...
}
Requirement 2.3.2
In cases of normal execution, the
provider
MUST NOT populate theresolution details
structure'serror message
field, or otherwise must populate it with a null or falsy value.
Requirement 2.3.3
In cases of abnormal execution, the
resolution details
structure'serror message
field MAY contain a string containing additional detail about the nature of the error.
2.4 Initialization
Requirement 2.4.1
The
provider
MAY define an initialization function which accepts the globalevaluation context
as an argument and performs initialization logic relevant to the provider.
Many feature flag frameworks or SDKs require some initialization before they can be used. They might require the completion of an HTTP request, establishing persistent connections, or starting timers or worker threads. The initialization function is an ideal place for such logic.
// MyProvider implementation of the initialize function defined in Provider
class MyProvider implements Provider {
//...
// the global context is passed to the initialization function
void initialize(EvaluationContext initialContext) {
/*
A hypothetical initialization function: make an initial call doing some bulk initial evaluation, start a worker to do periodic updates
*/
this.flagCache = this.restClient.bulkEvaluate(initialContext);
this.startPolling();
}
//...
}
Condition 2.4.2
The provider defines an
initialize
function.
Conditional Requirement 2.4.2.1
If the provider's
initialize
function fails to render the provider ready to evaluate flags, it SHOULD abnormally terminate.
If a provider is unable to start up correctly, it should indicate abnormal execution by throwing an exception, returning an error, or otherwise indicating so by means idiomatic to the implementation language.
If the error is irrecoverable (perhaps due to bad credentials or invalid configuration) the PROVIDER_FATAL
error code should be used.
see: error codes
2.5. Shutdown
Requirement 2.5.1
The provider MAY define a mechanism to gracefully shutdown and dispose of resources.
// MyProvider implementation of the dispose function defined in Provider
class MyProvider implements Provider, AutoDisposable {
//...
void dispose() {
// close connections, terminate threads or timers, etc...
}
Requirement 2.5.2
After a provider's shutdown function has terminated successfully, the provider's state MUST revert to its uninitialized state.
If a provider requires initialization, once it's shut down, it must transition to its initial NOT_READY
state. Some providers may allow reinitialization from this state.
Providers not requiring initialization are assumed to be ready at all times.
see: initialization
2.6. Provider context reconciliation
Static-context focused providers may need a mechanism to understand when their cache of evaluated flags must be invalidated or updated. An on context changed
function can be defined which performs whatever operations are needed to reconcile the evaluated flags with the new context.